We were shocked to learn that
a new Food Bill is being brought in in New Zealand. The new bill will make it a privilege and not a right to grow food.
We find two aspects of this bill alarming.
The first is the scope and impact the new bill has, and secondly that it has all happened so quietly. There has been
VERY little media coverage, on a bill which promises to jeopardise the future food security of the country.
We read that the bill is being
brought in because of the WTO, which of course has the US FDA behind it, and of course that is influenced by big business
(Monsanto and other players). It looks like this NZ food bill will pave the way to reduce the plant diversity and small
owner operations in New Zealand, for example by way of controlling the legality of seed saving and trading/barter/giving away;
all will be potentially illegal. The best website to read about the problems with the new bill is http://nzfoodsecurity.org (I have no connection with
this website)
Here are some snippets:
- It turns a human right (to grow food
and share it) into a government-authorised privilege that can be summarily revoked.
- It makes it illegal to distribute “food”
without authorisation, and it defines “food” in such a way that it includes nutrients, seeds, natural medicines,
essential minerals and drinks (including water).
- By controlling seeds, the bill takes
the power to grow food away from the public and puts it in the hands of seed companies. That power may be abused.
- Growing food for distribution must be
authorised, even for “cottage industries”, and such authorisation can be denied.
- Under the Food Bill, Police acting as
Food Safety Officers can raid premises without a warrant, using all equipment they deem necessary – including guns (Clause
265 – 1).
- Members of the private sector can also
be Food Safety Officers, as at Clause 243. So Monsanto employees can raid premises – including marae – backed
up by armed police.
- The Bill gives Food Safety Officers immunity
from criminal and civil prosecution.
- The Government has created this bill
to keep in line with its World Trade Organisation obligations under an international scheme called Codex Alimentarius (“Food
Book”). So it has to pass this bill in one form or another.
- The bill would undermine the efforts
of many people to become more self-sufficient within their local communities.
- Seed banks and seed-sharing networks
could be shut down if they could not obtain authorisation. Loss of seed variety would make it more difficult to grow one’s
own food.
- Home-grown food and some or all seed
could not be bartered on a scale or frequency necessary to feed people in communities where commercially available food has
become unaffordable or unavailable (for example due to economic collapse).
- Restrictions on the trade of food and
seed would quickly lead to the permanent loss of heirloom strains, as well as a general lowering of plant diversity in agriculture.
- Organic producers of heirloom foods could
lose market share to big-money agribusiness outfits, leading to an increase in the consumption of nutrient-poor and GE foods.